How might a Kantian deontologist evaluate cheating on an assignment?A Kantian deontologist, adhering to Immanuel Kant's ethical philosophy, would consider cheating as unequivocally incorrect.
In line with Kant's categorical imperative, an act is moral if it's universally applicable and respects individuals as ends, not just means. If cheating were universal, it would undermine the essence of education and clash with the principle of personal knowledge development.
Furthermore, cheating employs both educators and oneself merely as a means to achieve higher grades, disregarding individual dignity and intellectual advancement. Thus, from a Kantian viewpoint, irrespective of the circumstances or potential advantages, academic dishonesty is ethically unacceptable.